There is, apparently, a world where this cartoon not only makes sense, but is some sort of bold statement of conservative values.For those with no context, at the Miss America pageant, judge Perez Hilton, WHO IS GAY!!!!1!!!!111!!!, asked a Miss California what she thought of gay marriage. Miss California says that she thinks it is great all Americans can choose which marriage they want, but she doesn't believe in gay marriage, but rather supports "opposite marriage." Apparently, Perez gave her a bad score and she finished runner-up. The conservatives have decided that this is some sort of crime against having non-PC beliefs. It is okay to ask about them, apparently, but not okay to judge anyone because of them.
Anyway, there's your context. Now try to figure out what the hell is going on in that cartoon.
The commenters seem to like it and then overwhelming sentiment is that a gay man should not be judging a beauty pageant. There is a certain amount of outrage that this was allowed to happen.
I must say, I am at a loss.

1 comment:
Only the party of Tea Parties could see (uncomplicated) irony in the presence of a gay judge at a beauty pageant.
Post a Comment