This is a decent article from the SF Weekly about SEIU's agreement with California nursing
For those with no time to read, here's how it goes down. SEIU enters into an agreement with nursing home chains. The deal goes like this:
SEIU agrees to lobby on behalf of nursing homes for increased subsidies for nursing homes/care from the state, caps on lawsuit damages (tort reform) stemming from ill treatment in nursing homes, and opposition to laws that would tie increased subsidies to improvements in patient care.
In exchange, SEIU is allowed to organize a certain number of nursing homes in the chain without employer opposition. According to the article, the number of homes they get to organize is based on their success in passing/stopping legislation.
Additionally, the homes that SEIU does organize have a pre-written "template agreements" for a contract. This contract specifies that the union cannot bargain for increased staffing levels, increases/changes to benefits, or job conditions. There is specific language that bars the union from attempting to bargain wages that would put the employer at an "economic disadvantage." In other words, unionized employees will be paid the same rate as non-unionized employees. Employees are also forbidden from reporting on conditions within the homes, unless required to do so by law.
I don't know about you all, but there is no fucking way this looks like unionism to me. There are apparently some people within SEIU that oppose these sort of agreements, but I think that all of us who are repelled by this sort of agreement have to speak out about SEIU. They cannot be allowed to become the future of labor because they are good at publicity and because they can get huge with garbage deals like this. The Teamsters did the same thing and we are still fucked because of it. We must work to oppose it. Being anti-SEIU might somehow be anti-union, but it is pro-worker.